In 2025, the advertising landscape continues to evolve, shaped by rapid technological advancements and shifting consumer preferences. Among the most debated comparisons is that between Mainline TV advertising and OTT (Over-the-Top) advertising. Both platforms offer unique advantages, but when it comes to Return on Investment (ROI), marketers are increasingly analyzing which medium delivers more value per advertising dollar. Let’s break down how these two formats compare in terms of reach, targeting, engagement, and ultimately, ROI.


The Strength of Mainline TV Advertising in 2025

Mainline TV—comprising traditional broadcast and cable television—has long been the gold standard for mass-reach advertising. Despite the rise of digital platforms, TV still commands a significant share of ad budgets, particularly for brand-building campaigns.

Advantages of Mainline TV in 2025:

  • Massive Reach & Impact: TV remains unbeatable for reaching millions at once, especially during live events such as sports, award shows, or news specials.
  • Brand Trust: TV ads continue to be perceived as more credible and authoritative compared to online formats.
  • High-Quality Production Value: Brands use TV for storytelling with cinematic quality, building stronger emotional connections.

However, TV’s major drawback in 2025 is the lack of precise targeting. Even though addressable TV advertising is improving, it still can’t match the hyper-personalization of OTT platforms. Additionally, TV campaigns require larger budgets and longer lead times.


The Rise of OTT Advertising in 2025

OTT platforms like Netflix (with ads), Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ Hotstar, and regional players have become key advertising channels. With more users shifting to on-demand viewing, OTT advertising has evolved into a data-rich, performance-driven medium.

Advantages of OTT in 2025:

  • Advanced Targeting: OTT platforms offer demographic, behavioral, and even contextual targeting using first-party data.
  • Higher Engagement Rates: Ads on OTT platforms are often non-skippable, placed in premium content, and integrated with interactive elements.
  • Measurable Results: OTT allows granular tracking of impressions, CTRs, view-through rates, and conversions in real-time.

OTT’s challenge lies in fragmentation—audiences are scattered across multiple platforms and subscriptions. This makes it difficult to achieve the kind of unified reach that Mainline TV offers.


Comparing ROI: Mainline TV vs. OTT Advertising

In 2025, ROI is increasingly defined by performance metrics, not just reach. Here's how the two stack up:

Parameter

Mainline TV

OTT Advertising

Audience Reach

Broad and national

Targeted and niche

Cost Efficiency

High upfront costs

Flexible, performance-based pricing

Targeting

Limited (except addressable TV)

Highly targeted by user data

Measurement

GRPs, Nielsen Ratings

Real-time analytics & performance metrics

Creative Format

15-30 second high-production ads

Interactive, skippable/non-skippable ads

ROI Potential

High for awareness

High for conversions and retargeting


Which One Offers Better ROI in 2025?

For brand awareness and mass campaigns, Mainline TV still provides value, especially when paired with cultural moments and broad storytelling. However, when it comes to precision, performance, and conversion-driven campaigns, OTT advertising offers superior ROI in 2025. Its ability to personalize content, measure performance in real time, and adapt quickly to consumer behavior gives it an edge in today’s data-first marketing environment.


Conclusion

The best advertising ROI in 2025 often lies in a hybrid approach—leveraging the mass appeal of Mainline TV with the data-driven precision of OTT platforms. Brands that blend both formats strategically—using TV for trust and reach, and OTT for targeted performance—are seeing the highest returns on investment in the current media landscape.

 

Elyts Advertising and Branding Solutions www.elyts.in (India) | www.elyts.agency  (UAE)